Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
NCLAT held that the Section 7 application by home-buyers against the Corporate Debtor was maintainable and not barred by limitation. The Tribunal found sufficient evidence of debt and default, with funds received from home-buyers exceeding Rs. 1 Cr. The allegations of collusive litigation were rejected, emphasizing that inter-shareholder disputes cannot prejudice home-buyers' rights. The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's order admitting the Section 7 application, recognizing home-buyers as legitimate financial creditors who have been awaiting project completion for over a decade.
NCLAT held that the Section 7 application by home-buyers against the Corporate Debtor was maintainable and not barred by limitation. The Tribunal found sufficient evidence of debt and default, with funds received from home-buyers exceeding Rs. 1 Cr. The allegations of collusive litigation were rejected, emphasizing that inter-shareholder disputes cannot prejudice home-buyers' rights. The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's order admitting the Section 7 application, recognizing home-buyers as legitimate financial creditors who have been awaiting project completion for over a decade.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.