Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
SC held that Section 11 of SARFAESI Act mandates statutory arbitration for disputes between banks, financial institutions, or asset reconstruction companies relating to securitization, reconstruction, or non-payment of dues. The provision creates a legal fiction presuming an arbitration agreement exists without requiring explicit written consent. The court affirmed that the dispute resolution mechanism under Section 11 is mandatory and cannot be circumvented by alternative guidelines. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, directing the parties to resolve their dispute through arbitration as prescribed under the SARFAESI Act.
SC held that Section 11 of SARFAESI Act mandates statutory arbitration for disputes between banks, financial institutions, or asset reconstruction companies relating to securitization, reconstruction, or non-payment of dues. The provision creates a legal fiction presuming an arbitration agreement exists without requiring explicit written consent. The court affirmed that the dispute resolution mechanism under Section 11 is mandatory and cannot be circumvented by alternative guidelines. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, directing the parties to resolve their dispute through arbitration as prescribed under the SARFAESI Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
