Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC ruled that the block period of six years for reassessment under Section 153C(1)(b) is to be calculated from 28.07.2022. The extended ten-year period is inapplicable in this case. The jurisdictional notice for Assessment Year 2016-17, falling beyond the six-year block period, was deemed unsustainable. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the court set aside the impugned notice, effectively invalidating the tax department's attempt to reopen the assessment beyond the prescribed statutory timeframe.
HC ruled that the block period of six years for reassessment under Section 153C(1)(b) is to be calculated from 28.07.2022. The extended ten-year period is inapplicable in this case. The jurisdictional notice for Assessment Year 2016-17, falling beyond the six-year block period, was deemed unsustainable. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the court set aside the impugned notice, effectively invalidating the tax department's attempt to reopen the assessment beyond the prescribed statutory timeframe.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
