Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC held that the service of notices via email address listed on MCA website was valid and compliant with procedural rules. The petitioner received and responded to the scrutiny notice, thereby acknowledging awareness of assessment proceedings. Section 292BB was applicable as the petitioner participated in the inquiry and cannot subsequently challenge notice service. The court found no violation of natural justice principles, rejecting the petitioner's contention of improper notice service. The assessment order was upheld, with the court emphasizing that the petitioner's partial response and subsequent non-compliance undermined its procedural objections.
HC held that the service of notices via email address listed on MCA website was valid and compliant with procedural rules. The petitioner received and responded to the scrutiny notice, thereby acknowledging awareness of assessment proceedings. Section 292BB was applicable as the petitioner participated in the inquiry and cannot subsequently challenge notice service. The court found no violation of natural justice principles, rejecting the petitioner's contention of improper notice service. The assessment order was upheld, with the court emphasizing that the petitioner's partial response and subsequent non-compliance undermined its procedural objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.