Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC determined the legality of service under Section 153 of the Customs Act, 1962, finding that registered post was the sole valid communication method prior to 2018. Speed post service was improper. The court quashed orders by the Additional Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals), holding the appeal was timely filed on 07.11.2017. A writ of certiorari was issued, directing the authority to adjudicate the appeal on merits. The writ petition was allowed, with interim orders discharged and interlocutory applications disposed of accordingly.
HC determined the legality of service under Section 153 of the Customs Act, 1962, finding that registered post was the sole valid communication method prior to 2018. Speed post service was improper. The court quashed orders by the Additional Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals), holding the appeal was timely filed on 07.11.2017. A writ of certiorari was issued, directing the authority to adjudicate the appeal on merits. The writ petition was allowed, with interim orders discharged and interlocutory applications disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.