Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT upheld penalty u/s.270A for underreporting of income based on suppressed sales discovered during survey. Despite partner's initial admission and subsequent retraction, incriminating documents substantiated undisclosed income. The tribunal found no procedural infirmity in penalty imposition, noting the assessee's repeated non-compliance and failure to effectively challenge the revenue's claims. The penalty was directed to be recalculated proportionate to the reduced income quantum, affirming the CIT(A)'s earlier order. The tribunal concluded that the suppressed sales constituted misreporting under section 270A, warranting statutory penalty.
ITAT upheld penalty u/s.270A for underreporting of income based on suppressed sales discovered during survey. Despite partner's initial admission and subsequent retraction, incriminating documents substantiated undisclosed income. The tribunal found no procedural infirmity in penalty imposition, noting the assessee's repeated non-compliance and failure to effectively challenge the revenue's claims. The penalty was directed to be recalculated proportionate to the reduced income quantum, affirming the CIT(A)'s earlier order. The tribunal concluded that the suppressed sales constituted misreporting under section 270A, warranting statutory penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
