Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling sc...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT examined penalty proceedings u/s 271D regarding alleged cash receipt of property sale consideration. The tribunal found AO and CIT(A)'s presumption of cash payment without explicit documentary evidence was incorrect. The appellate tribunal set aside the penalty order and restored the matter to AO for further investigation to definitively ascertain whether sale consideration was received in cash, contravening sec.269SS. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, requiring the AO to conduct a comprehensive re-examination of the mode of payment and potential statutory violations.
The ITAT examined penalty proceedings u/s 271D regarding alleged cash receipt of property sale consideration. The tribunal found AO and CIT(A)'s presumption of cash payment without explicit documentary evidence was incorrect. The appellate tribunal set aside the penalty order and restored the matter to AO for further investigation to definitively ascertain whether sale consideration was received in cash, contravening sec.269SS. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, requiring the AO to conduct a comprehensive re-examination of the mode of payment and potential statutory violations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
