Mandatory textile export qualifiers distinguish flame-retardant fabrics from other listed fabrics for automated identification under the textiles ince...
Personal liberty safeguards restrict arrest after court-directed GST appearance, requiring interim release where authorities overreach pending proceed...
Alternative statutory remedy and delay bar GST writ challenges despite pending rectification, while distinct subject matter permits parallel proceedin...
The ITAT examined penalty proceedings u/s 271D regarding alleged cash receipt of property sale consideration. The tribunal found AO and CIT(A)'s presumption of cash payment without explicit documentary evidence was incorrect. The appellate tribunal set aside the penalty order and restored the matter to AO for further investigation to definitively ascertain whether sale consideration was received in cash, contravening sec.269SS. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, requiring the AO to conduct a comprehensive re-examination of the mode of payment and potential statutory violations.
The ITAT examined penalty proceedings u/s 271D regarding alleged cash receipt of property sale consideration. The tribunal found AO and CIT(A)'s presumption of cash payment without explicit documentary evidence was incorrect. The appellate tribunal set aside the penalty order and restored the matter to AO for further investigation to definitively ascertain whether sale consideration was received in cash, contravening sec.269SS. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, requiring the AO to conduct a comprehensive re-examination of the mode of payment and potential statutory violations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
