Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
HC dismissed multiple writ petitions challenging customs license rejection and cancellation orders. The court held that since the Customs Act, 1962 provides an adequate statutory remedy through appeals, the writ petitions under Article 226 were not maintainable. The court referenced precedents emphasizing that when a specific statutory appeal mechanism exists, judicial review through writ jurisdiction is inappropriate. Consequently, all petitions were dismissed, with petitioners directed to utilize statutory appeal mechanisms if adverse orders are passed.
HC dismissed multiple writ petitions challenging customs license rejection and cancellation orders. The court held that since the Customs Act, 1962 provides an adequate statutory remedy through appeals, the writ petitions under Article 226 were not maintainable. The court referenced precedents emphasizing that when a specific statutory appeal mechanism exists, judicial review through writ jurisdiction is inappropriate. Consequently, all petitions were dismissed, with petitioners directed to utilize statutory appeal mechanisms if adverse orders are passed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
