Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the appellate authority's rejection of an appeal beyond statutory limitation period. The court upheld the show cause notice and redemption fine imposed under Sections 122 and 130 of the OGST Act, 2017, for stock shortage discovered during a search and seizure operation. The petitioner's attempt to challenge the procedural aspects under Article 226 was rejected, with the court noting the petitioner's earlier admission of stock shortage and concurrence with penalty payment. The decision emphasized adherence to statutory limitations and judicial discipline, finding no merit in the challenge to the authority's jurisdiction or powers.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the appellate authority's rejection of an appeal beyond statutory limitation period. The court upheld the show cause notice and redemption fine imposed under Sections 122 and 130 of the OGST Act, 2017, for stock shortage discovered during a search and seizure operation. The petitioner's attempt to challenge the procedural aspects under Article 226 was rejected, with the court noting the petitioner's earlier admission of stock shortage and concurrence with penalty payment. The decision emphasized adherence to statutory limitations and judicial discipline, finding no merit in the challenge to the authority's jurisdiction or powers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
