PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
AT determined appellant violated FEMA, 1999 by illegally possessing unaccounted foreign currency without authorization from RBI. The tribunal found appellant's explanation for foreign currency possession unconvincing and identified mala fide intentions. The seized foreign currency equivalent to INR 3,30,82,775.28 was confiscated under Section 13(2), with a penalty of Rs. One lakh imposed. Additionally, the payment of USD 22,000 to an NRI without RBI permission constituted a breach of Section 3(b), resulting in a supplementary penalty of Rs. 10,000. The appeal was dismissed, and the Adjudicating Authority's original order was fully upheld.
AT determined appellant violated FEMA, 1999 by illegally possessing unaccounted foreign currency without authorization from RBI. The tribunal found appellant's explanation for foreign currency possession unconvincing and identified mala fide intentions. The seized foreign currency equivalent to INR 3,30,82,775.28 was confiscated under Section 13(2), with a penalty of Rs. One lakh imposed. Additionally, the payment of USD 22,000 to an NRI without RBI permission constituted a breach of Section 3(b), resulting in a supplementary penalty of Rs. 10,000. The appeal was dismissed, and the Adjudicating Authority's original order was fully upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
