Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the AO to verify whether the assessee claimed asset acquisition costs as "application of income" in current or prior years. The Tribunal held that depreciation disallowance under Section 11(6) is permissible only if asset acquisition costs were previously claimed as income application. Based on the assessee's Chartered Accountant certificate and record verification, the Tribunal directed the AO to conduct a comprehensive review and provide relief if no prior income application claim is found, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with statutory provisions.
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the AO to verify whether the assessee claimed asset acquisition costs as "application of income" in current or prior years. The Tribunal held that depreciation disallowance under Section 11(6) is permissible only if asset acquisition costs were previously claimed as income application. Based on the assessee's Chartered Accountant certificate and record verification, the Tribunal directed the AO to conduct a comprehensive review and provide relief if no prior income application claim is found, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.