Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the AO to verify whether the assessee claimed asset acquisition costs as "application of income" in current or prior years. The Tribunal held that depreciation disallowance under Section 11(6) is permissible only if asset acquisition costs were previously claimed as income application. Based on the assessee's Chartered Accountant certificate and record verification, the Tribunal directed the AO to conduct a comprehensive review and provide relief if no prior income application claim is found, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with statutory provisions.
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the AO to verify whether the assessee claimed asset acquisition costs as "application of income" in current or prior years. The Tribunal held that depreciation disallowance under Section 11(6) is permissible only if asset acquisition costs were previously claimed as income application. Based on the assessee's Chartered Accountant certificate and record verification, the Tribunal directed the AO to conduct a comprehensive review and provide relief if no prior income application claim is found, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.