Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC determined the proper basis for stamp duty levy in a demerger scheme. The Collector of Stamps erroneously computed duty on the net worth of the demerged undertaking, contrary to Article 25 (da) (ii) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act. The court held that stamp duty must be calculated based on the market value of shares issued and allotted, plus any consideration paid. Since no separate consideration was involved, the value of shares allotted to equity shareholders constitutes the entire transaction consideration. The HC ruled that the statutory formula must be strictly followed, rejecting the use of enterprise value or net worth as a basis for stamp duty calculation. Petition was allowed, directing recalculation of stamp duty in accordance with the prescribed statutory method.
HC determined the proper basis for stamp duty levy in a demerger scheme. The Collector of Stamps erroneously computed duty on the net worth of the demerged undertaking, contrary to Article 25 (da) (ii) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act. The court held that stamp duty must be calculated based on the market value of shares issued and allotted, plus any consideration paid. Since no separate consideration was involved, the value of shares allotted to equity shareholders constitutes the entire transaction consideration. The HC ruled that the statutory formula must be strictly followed, rejecting the use of enterprise value or net worth as a basis for stamp duty calculation. Petition was allowed, directing recalculation of stamp duty in accordance with the prescribed statutory method.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.