Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing exemption under Section 54F. The tribunal found that the assessee effectively owned only one residential house at the time of transfer of original asset, having gifted another property to his daughter. The tribunal rejected technical objections by the Assessing Officer regarding the gift's validity and timing of property purchase. The court determined that the assessee met substantive requirements of Section 54F, including investing capital gains in a residential house property within prescribed timelines. The land purchased was considered valid for residential construction, thus qualifying for the exemption. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, upholding the assessee's claim for tax exemption.
ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing exemption under Section 54F. The tribunal found that the assessee effectively owned only one residential house at the time of transfer of original asset, having gifted another property to his daughter. The tribunal rejected technical objections by the Assessing Officer regarding the gift's validity and timing of property purchase. The court determined that the assessee met substantive requirements of Section 54F, including investing capital gains in a residential house property within prescribed timelines. The land purchased was considered valid for residential construction, thus qualifying for the exemption. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, upholding the assessee's claim for tax exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.