Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled that for AY 2015-16 and 2016-17, the Assessing Officer (AO) incorrectly applied Rule 11UA in determining fair market value (FMV) of shares. The tribunal found that the rule requiring FMV of underlying assets was only applicable from AY 2018-19. The AO should have valued shares using book value as per the balance sheet for the relevant assessment years. The CIT(A)'s order deleting additions under section 56(2)(vii)(c) was upheld, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed, finding no procedural or substantive irregularities in the assessee's share acquisition and valuation.
ITAT ruled that for AY 2015-16 and 2016-17, the Assessing Officer (AO) incorrectly applied Rule 11UA in determining fair market value (FMV) of shares. The tribunal found that the rule requiring FMV of underlying assets was only applicable from AY 2018-19. The AO should have valued shares using book value as per the balance sheet for the relevant assessment years. The CIT(A)'s order deleting additions under section 56(2)(vii)(c) was upheld, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed, finding no procedural or substantive irregularities in the assessee's share acquisition and valuation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
