Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Tri dismissed the petition alleging oppression and mismanagement under Sections 397 & 398 of Companies Act, 1956. The tribunal found the petitioner suppressed material facts about initial company formation and land acquisition agreements. Documentary evidence demonstrated the petitioner was part of an original group agreement with equal capital participation. The petitioner failed to substantiate claims of misappropriation and was deemed to have approached the tribunal without clean hands. The tribunal emphasized that party conduct is crucial in equitable proceedings, ultimately rejecting the petitioner's allegations as vague and unsupported by sufficient evidence.
Tri dismissed the petition alleging oppression and mismanagement under Sections 397 & 398 of Companies Act, 1956. The tribunal found the petitioner suppressed material facts about initial company formation and land acquisition agreements. Documentary evidence demonstrated the petitioner was part of an original group agreement with equal capital participation. The petitioner failed to substantiate claims of misappropriation and was deemed to have approached the tribunal without clean hands. The tribunal emphasized that party conduct is crucial in equitable proceedings, ultimately rejecting the petitioner's allegations as vague and unsupported by sufficient evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
