Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC directed formation of Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe potential collusive practices between banks and builders in housing development projects across Noida, Greater Noida, and Gurugram regions. The court noted significant non-compliance with previous judicial directives, with only 9 banks and 5 developers submitting required affidavits. The Standing Counsel for CBI was instructed to be present for SIT constitution and potential case registration, focusing on investigating financial irregularities where homebuyers have paid substantial amounts but projects remain unfinished or unstarted. The ruling emphasized strict adherence to regulatory guidelines, protecting homebuyers' interests, and ensuring transparent fund disbursement by financial institutions.
SC directed formation of Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe potential collusive practices between banks and builders in housing development projects across Noida, Greater Noida, and Gurugram regions. The court noted significant non-compliance with previous judicial directives, with only 9 banks and 5 developers submitting required affidavits. The Standing Counsel for CBI was instructed to be present for SIT constitution and potential case registration, focusing on investigating financial irregularities where homebuyers have paid substantial amounts but projects remain unfinished or unstarted. The ruling emphasized strict adherence to regulatory guidelines, protecting homebuyers' interests, and ensuring transparent fund disbursement by financial institutions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
