Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
HC quashed GST registration cancellation order due to procedural irregularities. The court found that no proper notice was served to the petitioner and the verification report lacked substantive evidence to support registration cancellation. Critical procedural defects, including failure to provide adequate notice and absence of concrete material proving business non-operation, rendered the original administrative order unsustainable. The court directed reconsideration of the matter, effectively reinstating the petitioner's GST registration and emphasizing principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.
HC quashed GST registration cancellation order due to procedural irregularities. The court found that no proper notice was served to the petitioner and the verification report lacked substantive evidence to support registration cancellation. Critical procedural defects, including failure to provide adequate notice and absence of concrete material proving business non-operation, rendered the original administrative order unsustainable. The court directed reconsideration of the matter, effectively reinstating the petitioner's GST registration and emphasizing principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
