Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ruled on the legality of creating additional dues by GST Department after NCLT's Resolution Plan approval. The court held that once a Resolution Plan is approved under IBC, subsequent claims by creditors are impermissible as they would disrupt the resolution process. The court specifically noted that the tax department was aware of IBC proceedings and had previously filed claims through the Resolution Professional. Consequently, the court quashed the assessment order and demand notice issued under Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017, which were raised post-Resolution Plan approval, thereby protecting the sanctity of the resolution mechanism and preventing potential disruption to the insolvency resolution process.
HC ruled on the legality of creating additional dues by GST Department after NCLT's Resolution Plan approval. The court held that once a Resolution Plan is approved under IBC, subsequent claims by creditors are impermissible as they would disrupt the resolution process. The court specifically noted that the tax department was aware of IBC proceedings and had previously filed claims through the Resolution Professional. Consequently, the court quashed the assessment order and demand notice issued under Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017, which were raised post-Resolution Plan approval, thereby protecting the sanctity of the resolution mechanism and preventing potential disruption to the insolvency resolution process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
