Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4785
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95683 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the petition challenging registration cancellation under CGST Act. The petitioner failed to furnish final returns as mandated by Section 29(2)(c), did not respond to show cause notice, and did not avail hearing opportunity. Despite statutory provisions for revocation under Section 30 and appellate remedy under Section 107, petitioner remained inactive for over 13 months. The court held that procedural requirements were followed, and the petitioner is estopped from challenging the cancellation order due to acquiescence. The petition was consequently dismissed.
HC dismissed the petition challenging registration cancellation under CGST Act. The petitioner failed to furnish final returns as mandated by Section 29(2)(c), did not respond to show cause notice, and did not avail hearing opportunity. Despite statutory provisions for revocation under Section 30 and appellate remedy under Section 107, petitioner remained inactive for over 13 months. The court held that procedural requirements were followed, and the petitioner is estopped from challenging the cancellation order due to acquiescence. The petition was consequently dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4785
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
