Related-party creditor exclusion bars CoC participation where lender rights show policy-making involvement, and post-CIRP assignment cannot cure ineli...
Rectification of apparent typographical errors may proceed without hearing when tax liability, input tax credit, and ruling substance remain unchanged...
HC determined that cognizance of offences under Section 174-A IPC requires a mandatory written complaint by the concerned public servant, as per Section 195(1)(a)(i) Cr.P.C. The court held that judicial interpretation cannot assume legislative intent or fill legislative gaps. Following precedential reasoning from prior Supreme Court judgments, the court affirmed that taking cognizance without a written complaint would be procedurally invalid. The petition challenging charges was consequently allowed, setting aside the previous order and reaffirming the strict procedural requirement of a written complaint for initiating proceedings under Section 174-A IPC.
HC determined that cognizance of offences under Section 174-A IPC requires a mandatory written complaint by the concerned public servant, as per Section 195(1)(a)(i) Cr.P.C. The court held that judicial interpretation cannot assume legislative intent or fill legislative gaps. Following precedential reasoning from prior Supreme Court judgments, the court affirmed that taking cognizance without a written complaint would be procedurally invalid. The petition challenging charges was consequently allowed, setting aside the previous order and reaffirming the strict procedural requirement of a written complaint for initiating proceedings under Section 174-A IPC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
