Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC set aside ex parte assessment order due to violation of natural justice principles. The order was passed without proper service of show cause notice, as notices were uploaded in an obscure portal column rendering them effectively unnoticed by the petitioner. The Deputy Commissioner's rejection of appeal on limitation grounds was overruled. The HC remanded the matter for fresh consideration, with the petitioner willing to pay 15% of disputed tax. The procedural defect in service of notice fundamentally invalidated the original assessment, ensuring the petitioner's right to fair hearing was reinstated.
HC set aside ex parte assessment order due to violation of natural justice principles. The order was passed without proper service of show cause notice, as notices were uploaded in an obscure portal column rendering them effectively unnoticed by the petitioner. The Deputy Commissioner's rejection of appeal on limitation grounds was overruled. The HC remanded the matter for fresh consideration, with the petitioner willing to pay 15% of disputed tax. The procedural defect in service of notice fundamentally invalidated the original assessment, ensuring the petitioner's right to fair hearing was reinstated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
