Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
SC held that the plaint must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC due to absence of cause of action. An agreement to sell does not confer substantive rights against third-party possessors, and the proposed purchaser cannot institute a suit against parties in possession. The court emphasized that without a registered sale deed, the purchaser lacks legal standing to challenge ownership or possession. The appeal was allowed, setting aside lower court orders, with implications for preventing speculative litigation and protecting institutional interests from resource-draining legal proceedings.
SC held that the plaint must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC due to absence of cause of action. An agreement to sell does not confer substantive rights against third-party possessors, and the proposed purchaser cannot institute a suit against parties in possession. The court emphasized that without a registered sale deed, the purchaser lacks legal standing to challenge ownership or possession. The appeal was allowed, setting aside lower court orders, with implications for preventing speculative litigation and protecting institutional interests from resource-draining legal proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
