Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
SC held that Respondent No. 1 breached multiple contractual obligations in the allotment agreement, including failure to secure statutory approvals and execute sub-lease documents. The court ordered Respondent No. 1 to refund Rs. 28,11,31,939 to the Appellant. However, due to the Appellant's questionable conduct and violation of the "clean hands" doctrine, the court denied any additional interest on the refunded amount. The impugned High Court judgment was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of, with Respondent No. 1 directed to refund the first installment without interest.
SC held that Respondent No. 1 breached multiple contractual obligations in the allotment agreement, including failure to secure statutory approvals and execute sub-lease documents. The court ordered Respondent No. 1 to refund Rs. 28,11,31,939 to the Appellant. However, due to the Appellant's questionable conduct and violation of the "clean hands" doctrine, the court denied any additional interest on the refunded amount. The impugned High Court judgment was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of, with Respondent No. 1 directed to refund the first installment without interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
