Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT denied registration u/s 12AB for trust due to non-compliance with statutory requirements. The tribunal found that the trust's object clause contained provisions inconsistent with section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act. Despite being granted provisional registration, the final registration was rejected because the assessee failed to demonstrate amendment of objects or compliance with legal mandates. The Finance Act, 2022 amendments expanded grounds for registration denial, requiring strict adherence to legal frameworks. Consequently, both the primary registration application and the 80G registration were dismissed, with the tribunal rejecting all grounds raised by the assessee's authorized representative.
ITAT denied registration u/s 12AB for trust due to non-compliance with statutory requirements. The tribunal found that the trust's object clause contained provisions inconsistent with section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act. Despite being granted provisional registration, the final registration was rejected because the assessee failed to demonstrate amendment of objects or compliance with legal mandates. The Finance Act, 2022 amendments expanded grounds for registration denial, requiring strict adherence to legal frameworks. Consequently, both the primary registration application and the 80G registration were dismissed, with the tribunal rejecting all grounds raised by the assessee's authorized representative.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.