Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT determined digital still image video cameras qualify for basic customs duty (BCD) exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus dated 01.03.2005, as amended by Notification No. 15/2012 dated 17.03.2012. Following a larger bench reference on 14.06.2024 in Customs Appeal No. 52218 of 2019, the tribunal held that the imported digital cameras are entitled to the exemption. The impugned order dated 28.10.2016 was set aside, and the customs appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellants regarding the BCD exemption claim.
CESTAT determined digital still image video cameras qualify for basic customs duty (BCD) exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus dated 01.03.2005, as amended by Notification No. 15/2012 dated 17.03.2012. Following a larger bench reference on 14.06.2024 in Customs Appeal No. 52218 of 2019, the tribunal held that the imported digital cameras are entitled to the exemption. The impugned order dated 28.10.2016 was set aside, and the customs appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellants regarding the BCD exemption claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.