Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC remanded tax assessment proceedings involving long-term capital gains on property sale. The ITAT directed de novo assessment requiring personal hearing, which the assessing officer failed to provide. The court found the officer improperly considered previous materials and did not grant the assessee an opportunity to be heard through video conference. Regarding Section 50-C, the court clarified that guideline value supersedes sale deed value for tax calculation, and the petitioner is entitled to be heard on tax liability proportionate to property ownership. The matter was consequently returned to the assessing officer for proper procedural compliance, with the writ appeal being allowed.
HC remanded tax assessment proceedings involving long-term capital gains on property sale. The ITAT directed de novo assessment requiring personal hearing, which the assessing officer failed to provide. The court found the officer improperly considered previous materials and did not grant the assessee an opportunity to be heard through video conference. Regarding Section 50-C, the court clarified that guideline value supersedes sale deed value for tax calculation, and the petitioner is entitled to be heard on tax liability proportionate to property ownership. The matter was consequently returned to the assessing officer for proper procedural compliance, with the writ appeal being allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
