Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC remanded tax assessment proceedings involving long-term capital gains on property sale. The ITAT directed de novo assessment requiring personal hearing, which the assessing officer failed to provide. The court found the officer improperly considered previous materials and did not grant the assessee an opportunity to be heard through video conference. Regarding Section 50-C, the court clarified that guideline value supersedes sale deed value for tax calculation, and the petitioner is entitled to be heard on tax liability proportionate to property ownership. The matter was consequently returned to the assessing officer for proper procedural compliance, with the writ appeal being allowed.
HC remanded tax assessment proceedings involving long-term capital gains on property sale. The ITAT directed de novo assessment requiring personal hearing, which the assessing officer failed to provide. The court found the officer improperly considered previous materials and did not grant the assessee an opportunity to be heard through video conference. Regarding Section 50-C, the court clarified that guideline value supersedes sale deed value for tax calculation, and the petitioner is entitled to be heard on tax liability proportionate to property ownership. The matter was consequently returned to the assessing officer for proper procedural compliance, with the writ appeal being allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
