Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week period specified in the show cause notice, rendering the 28.07.2022 notice invalid. For AY 2015-16, the notice was issued beyond the six-year limitation period, expiring on 31.03.2022. Consequently, the tribunal quashed both reassessment notices and subsequent proceedings as bad in law, dismissing the revenue's grounds of appeal and upholding the limitation bar established by judicial precedents.
The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week period specified in the show cause notice, rendering the 28.07.2022 notice invalid. For AY 2015-16, the notice was issued beyond the six-year limitation period, expiring on 31.03.2022. Consequently, the tribunal quashed both reassessment notices and subsequent proceedings as bad in law, dismissing the revenue's grounds of appeal and upholding the limitation bar established by judicial precedents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
