Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week period specified in the show cause notice, rendering the 28.07.2022 notice invalid. For AY 2015-16, the notice was issued beyond the six-year limitation period, expiring on 31.03.2022. Consequently, the tribunal quashed both reassessment notices and subsequent proceedings as bad in law, dismissing the revenue's grounds of appeal and upholding the limitation bar established by judicial precedents.
The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week period specified in the show cause notice, rendering the 28.07.2022 notice invalid. For AY 2015-16, the notice was issued beyond the six-year limitation period, expiring on 31.03.2022. Consequently, the tribunal quashed both reassessment notices and subsequent proceedings as bad in law, dismissing the revenue's grounds of appeal and upholding the limitation bar established by judicial precedents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
