Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling sc...
Stamp valuation increases after registration-fee payment led to deletion of property-purchase addition within tolerance and without valuation referral...
Capital Asset Conversion Requires Proven Business Stock Treatment; Paper Consideration in Spousal Flat Transfers Does Not Create Taxable Business Inco...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week period specified in the show cause notice, rendering the 28.07.2022 notice invalid. For AY 2015-16, the notice was issued beyond the six-year limitation period, expiring on 31.03.2022. Consequently, the tribunal quashed both reassessment notices and subsequent proceedings as bad in law, dismissing the revenue's grounds of appeal and upholding the limitation bar established by judicial precedents.
The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week period specified in the show cause notice, rendering the 28.07.2022 notice invalid. For AY 2015-16, the notice was issued beyond the six-year limitation period, expiring on 31.03.2022. Consequently, the tribunal quashed both reassessment notices and subsequent proceedings as bad in law, dismissing the revenue's grounds of appeal and upholding the limitation bar established by judicial precedents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
