Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding rectification u/s 154, finding no prima facie mistake apparent from records. The tribunal concluded that the deduction u/s 80IA(12A) was comprehensively examined by CIT(A), and the provisions of section 154 could not be invoked to modify the assessee's claim. The AO was not justified in withdrawing the deduction claim under section 80IA(2A), and both legal grounds and case merits supported dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding rectification u/s 154, finding no prima facie mistake apparent from records. The tribunal concluded that the deduction u/s 80IA(12A) was comprehensively examined by CIT(A), and the provisions of section 154 could not be invoked to modify the assessee's claim. The AO was not justified in withdrawing the deduction claim under section 80IA(2A), and both legal grounds and case merits supported dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.