Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
HC dismisses writ petition challenging seizure of gold bars exceeding permissible import limit. The court upheld lower authorities' decision denying option to pay fine under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962. Distinguishing prior precedents, the court noted the instant case involved gold bars significantly over legal limit, unlike previous cases with jewelry within permissible quantum. The court found no merit in petitioners' arguments and rejected interference under Article 226, thereby confirming the original confiscation order and declining alternative fine payment option.
HC dismisses writ petition challenging seizure of gold bars exceeding permissible import limit. The court upheld lower authorities' decision denying option to pay fine under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962. Distinguishing prior precedents, the court noted the instant case involved gold bars significantly over legal limit, unlike previous cases with jewelry within permissible quantum. The court found no merit in petitioners' arguments and rejected interference under Article 226, thereby confirming the original confiscation order and declining alternative fine payment option.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
