Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice, finding no procedural irregularity in the transfer of case from faceless to jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file reply to the show cause notice within two weeks, directing the first respondent to provide a 14-day personal hearing and decide the matter in accordance with law. The jurisdictional AO's notice referencing the earlier faceless AO notice was deemed sufficient to prevent confusion, rendering the petitioner's contention of perplexity baseless.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice, finding no procedural irregularity in the transfer of case from faceless to jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file reply to the show cause notice within two weeks, directing the first respondent to provide a 14-day personal hearing and decide the matter in accordance with law. The jurisdictional AO's notice referencing the earlier faceless AO notice was deemed sufficient to prevent confusion, rendering the petitioner's contention of perplexity baseless.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.