Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice, finding no procedural irregularity in the transfer of case from faceless to jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file reply to the show cause notice within two weeks, directing the first respondent to provide a 14-day personal hearing and decide the matter in accordance with law. The jurisdictional AO's notice referencing the earlier faceless AO notice was deemed sufficient to prevent confusion, rendering the petitioner's contention of perplexity baseless.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the show cause notice, finding no procedural irregularity in the transfer of case from faceless to jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file reply to the show cause notice within two weeks, directing the first respondent to provide a 14-day personal hearing and decide the matter in accordance with law. The jurisdictional AO's notice referencing the earlier faceless AO notice was deemed sufficient to prevent confusion, rendering the petitioner's contention of perplexity baseless.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.