Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled on a trust's tax exemption under section 11, addressing multiple key issues: The tribunal held that exemption denial under section 13 should be limited only to the specific income violating provisions, not the entire trust income. The maximum marginal rate shall apply exclusively to the contravened income portion (Rs. 1,80,000), not the complete trust income. Regarding section 69A, impounded unverified documents were deemed insufficient for making unexplained income additions. The tribunal allowed exemption under section 11, permitted depreciation claim as an application of income, and confirmed that the trust could claim either depreciation or capital expenditure application, ensuring statutory compliance while preventing potential administrative overreach.
ITAT ruled on a trust's tax exemption under section 11, addressing multiple key issues: The tribunal held that exemption denial under section 13 should be limited only to the specific income violating provisions, not the entire trust income. The maximum marginal rate shall apply exclusively to the contravened income portion (Rs. 1,80,000), not the complete trust income. Regarding section 69A, impounded unverified documents were deemed insufficient for making unexplained income additions. The tribunal allowed exemption under section 11, permitted depreciation claim as an application of income, and confirmed that the trust could claim either depreciation or capital expenditure application, ensuring statutory compliance while preventing potential administrative overreach.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.