Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Page of 4921
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 98411 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving undisclosed income and stock valuation. The tribunal rejected the tax authority's attempt to treat stock purchases as undisclosed income under Section 69C. The stocks were found to be properly purchased and accounted for in business records. Regarding Section 115BBE's applicability, the tribunal followed precedent from Madras HC, determining that the amended provisions did not apply to the survey conducted on 29-09-2016. Consequently, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the revision order by the PCIT and dismissing attempts to impose additional tax on the identified stocks.
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving undisclosed income and stock valuation. The tribunal rejected the tax authority's attempt to treat stock purchases as undisclosed income under Section 69C. The stocks were found to be properly purchased and accounted for in business records. Regarding Section 115BBE's applicability, the tribunal followed precedent from Madras HC, determining that the amended provisions did not apply to the survey conducted on 29-09-2016. Consequently, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the revision order by the PCIT and dismissing attempts to impose additional tax on the identified stocks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4921 
