Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, permitting benefit under New Tax Regime u/s.115BAC. The Tribunal found the Form No.10IE filing valid for A.Y. 2023-24, as submitted prior to the statutory return filing deadline. Despite a belated Form No.10IE for A.Y. 2022-23, the Tribunal followed precedent in Akshay Devendra Birari case, recognizing the assessee's option for the new tax regime. The decision emphasizes that timely option submission for the relevant assessment year determines eligibility for the beneficial tax treatment, effectively granting the assessee relief from the previous denial.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, permitting benefit under New Tax Regime u/s.115BAC. The Tribunal found the Form No.10IE filing valid for A.Y. 2023-24, as submitted prior to the statutory return filing deadline. Despite a belated Form No.10IE for A.Y. 2022-23, the Tribunal followed precedent in Akshay Devendra Birari case, recognizing the assessee's option for the new tax regime. The decision emphasizes that timely option submission for the relevant assessment year determines eligibility for the beneficial tax treatment, effectively granting the assessee relief from the previous denial.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.