Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
HC found the writ petition maintainable, quashing the sale certificate and declaring it null and void. The court ordered respondent No. 1 to refund Rs. 9,93,752.94 with 12% interest, foreclose the loan account, and remove the freeze on the petitioner's savings account. Additionally, the court directed RBI to investigate respondent No. 1's actions, imposed Rs. 5,00,000 compensation, and emphasized the critical importance of due diligence in auction sales, highlighting the bank's failure to disclose property encumbrances and conduct proper verification before sale.
HC found the writ petition maintainable, quashing the sale certificate and declaring it null and void. The court ordered respondent No. 1 to refund Rs. 9,93,752.94 with 12% interest, foreclose the loan account, and remove the freeze on the petitioner's savings account. Additionally, the court directed RBI to investigate respondent No. 1's actions, imposed Rs. 5,00,000 compensation, and emphasized the critical importance of due diligence in auction sales, highlighting the bank's failure to disclose property encumbrances and conduct proper verification before sale.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.