Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
HC adjudicated a tax dispute involving Input Tax Credit (ITC) misstatement. The court determined that the petitioner must follow prescribed guidelines by depositing 10% of the disputed amount within eight weeks. The demand confirmed by the Appellate Authority shall remain stayed until GST Appellate Tribunal's constitution. Upon tribunal notification, petitioner may file appeal through standard procedural mechanisms. The ex-parte order was conditionally modified, providing a structured pathway for potential further legal recourse while mandating partial financial compliance.
HC adjudicated a tax dispute involving Input Tax Credit (ITC) misstatement. The court determined that the petitioner must follow prescribed guidelines by depositing 10% of the disputed amount within eight weeks. The demand confirmed by the Appellate Authority shall remain stayed until GST Appellate Tribunal's constitution. Upon tribunal notification, petitioner may file appeal through standard procedural mechanisms. The ex-parte order was conditionally modified, providing a structured pathway for potential further legal recourse while mandating partial financial compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
