Request-driven road restoration attracts reverse-charge GST, not governmental-function treatment or compensatory-damages status for business recipient...
Road restoration charges for commercial pipeline works are taxable Government services, with reverse charge liability and no public-function exemption...
Model-wise import cap monitoring cannot justify withholding used multifunction machines where all-India tracking is absent and full security is furnis...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal challenging leave encashment deduction under section 10(10AA). The tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s rejection based on non-submission of Form 16 was untenable, as the Assessing Officer already had information about the claimed amount of Rs. 20,29,482. Pursuant to the CBDT notification dated 24th May 2023, the leave encashment limit was revised to Rs. 25,00,000, thereby enabling the assessee to claim the entire amount instead of the previously restricted Rs. 3,00,000. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction consistent with the revised statutory limit.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal challenging leave encashment deduction under section 10(10AA). The tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s rejection based on non-submission of Form 16 was untenable, as the Assessing Officer already had information about the claimed amount of Rs. 20,29,482. Pursuant to the CBDT notification dated 24th May 2023, the leave encashment limit was revised to Rs. 25,00,000, thereby enabling the assessee to claim the entire amount instead of the previously restricted Rs. 3,00,000. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction consistent with the revised statutory limit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.