Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance with statutory time limitations under Section 61 of IBC. The appellant failed to file certified copies and demonstrate sufficient cause for delay within the prescribed 30-day period extendable by 15 days. The court strictly interpreted procedural rules, emphasizing that legislative intent mandates adherence to limitation periods. The appellate tribunal's rejection of condonation applications was justified, as no compelling reasons were presented to explain the delay in filing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the statutory requirement for timely legal proceedings.
SC dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance with statutory time limitations under Section 61 of IBC. The appellant failed to file certified copies and demonstrate sufficient cause for delay within the prescribed 30-day period extendable by 15 days. The court strictly interpreted procedural rules, emphasizing that legislative intent mandates adherence to limitation periods. The appellate tribunal's rejection of condonation applications was justified, as no compelling reasons were presented to explain the delay in filing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the statutory requirement for timely legal proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
