Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
HC upheld Petitioner's entitlement to IGST refund for pharmaceutical product exports from July 2017 to April 2018. Despite technical processing challenges acknowledged by Respondents, the court mandated manual refund processing within two weeks, consistent with the earlier Refund Sanctioning Order. The technical impediment was deemed insufficient to obstruct the Petitioner's legitimate refund claim. Petition was consequently disposed of, directing immediate compliance by Respondents.
HC upheld Petitioner's entitlement to IGST refund for pharmaceutical product exports from July 2017 to April 2018. Despite technical processing challenges acknowledged by Respondents, the court mandated manual refund processing within two weeks, consistent with the earlier Refund Sanctioning Order. The technical impediment was deemed insufficient to obstruct the Petitioner's legitimate refund claim. Petition was consequently disposed of, directing immediate compliance by Respondents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
