Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
HC found a violation of Section 75(7) where the demand amount (Rs. 59,27,500/-) exceeded the show-cause notice amount (Rs. 28,15,200/-). Despite procedural irregularities in hearing scheduling, the court primarily focused on the statutory non-compliance. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the respondent to provide proper opportunity of hearing and issue a fresh order in accordance with legal provisions, thereby allowing the petition and ensuring procedural fairness.
HC found a violation of Section 75(7) where the demand amount (Rs. 59,27,500/-) exceeded the show-cause notice amount (Rs. 28,15,200/-). Despite procedural irregularities in hearing scheduling, the court primarily focused on the statutory non-compliance. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the respondent to provide proper opportunity of hearing and issue a fresh order in accordance with legal provisions, thereby allowing the petition and ensuring procedural fairness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
