Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
HC found a violation of Section 75(7) where the demand amount (Rs. 59,27,500/-) exceeded the show-cause notice amount (Rs. 28,15,200/-). Despite procedural irregularities in hearing scheduling, the court primarily focused on the statutory non-compliance. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the respondent to provide proper opportunity of hearing and issue a fresh order in accordance with legal provisions, thereby allowing the petition and ensuring procedural fairness.
HC found a violation of Section 75(7) where the demand amount (Rs. 59,27,500/-) exceeded the show-cause notice amount (Rs. 28,15,200/-). Despite procedural irregularities in hearing scheduling, the court primarily focused on the statutory non-compliance. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the respondent to provide proper opportunity of hearing and issue a fresh order in accordance with legal provisions, thereby allowing the petition and ensuring procedural fairness.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
