Credit-note turnover adjustments preserve inverted-duty refunds, while ministerial re-computation does not constitute an impermissible appellate reman...
Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Final benami adjudication bars contradictory tax-evasion prosecution where settlement findings confirm full disclosure and cooperation without conceal...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 97751 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC held that the Limitation Act applies comprehensively to recovery proceedings. Section 18 permits limitation period extension when liability is acknowledged, particularly where payment time has not yet matured. The respondents' technical objections were deemed dilatory, as they were aware of previous judicial determinations. The High Court's order was set aside, with writ petitions to be restored and heard after disposal of pending intra-court appeals. The limitation period for recovery proceedings was effectively extended due to respondents' liability acknowledgment, enabling the appellant to pursue legal remedies within prescribed timelines.
SC held that the Limitation Act applies comprehensively to recovery proceedings. Section 18 permits limitation period extension when liability is acknowledged, particularly where payment time has not yet matured. The respondents' technical objections were deemed dilatory, as they were aware of previous judicial determinations. The High Court's order was set aside, with writ petitions to be restored and heard after disposal of pending intra-court appeals. The limitation period for recovery proceedings was effectively extended due to respondents' liability acknowledgment, enabling the appellant to pursue legal remedies within prescribed timelines.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.