PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
HC interpreted the phrase "MIMO and LTE Products" in clause (iv) of Serial No. 13 of N/N. 11/2014-Customs dated 11th July, 2014, following the precedent established in Commissioner of Customs v. Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. The Court affirmed CESTAT's interpretation that the exclusion clause applies only to products combining both MIMO technology and LTE standards, not to products featuring either technology alone. Consequently, Wireless Access Points employing only MIMO technology without LTE standards remained eligible for Basic Customs Duty exemption. The Court found no question of law requiring determination and dismissed the appeal.
HC interpreted the phrase "MIMO and LTE Products" in clause (iv) of Serial No. 13 of N/N. 11/2014-Customs dated 11th July, 2014, following the precedent established in Commissioner of Customs v. Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. The Court affirmed CESTAT's interpretation that the exclusion clause applies only to products combining both MIMO technology and LTE standards, not to products featuring either technology alone. Consequently, Wireless Access Points employing only MIMO technology without LTE standards remained eligible for Basic Customs Duty exemption. The Court found no question of law requiring determination and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.