Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that foreign exchange fluctuation, whether gain or loss, must be treated as operating in nature, rejecting the TPO's classification as non-operating based on Rule 10TA. The Tribunal noted that Rule 10TA pertains only to Safe Harbour Rules when specifically opted for by the assessee. Following precedents from Delhi HC (Ameriprise India) and Karnataka HC (Subex Ltd), the ITAT directed that forex fluctuations be treated as operating items. Similarly, reversal of provisions for leave encashment and gratuity were deemed operating items. Regarding interest on overdue receivables from AEs, the ITAT deleted the adjustment, noting the assessee's consistent practice of not charging interest from either AEs or non-AEs, with significantly longer delays (545 days) for non-AEs compared to AEs (185 days).
The ITAT held that foreign exchange fluctuation, whether gain or loss, must be treated as operating in nature, rejecting the TPO's classification as non-operating based on Rule 10TA. The Tribunal noted that Rule 10TA pertains only to Safe Harbour Rules when specifically opted for by the assessee. Following precedents from Delhi HC (Ameriprise India) and Karnataka HC (Subex Ltd), the ITAT directed that forex fluctuations be treated as operating items. Similarly, reversal of provisions for leave encashment and gratuity were deemed operating items. Regarding interest on overdue receivables from AEs, the ITAT deleted the adjustment, noting the assessee's consistent practice of not charging interest from either AEs or non-AEs, with significantly longer delays (545 days) for non-AEs compared to AEs (185 days).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.