Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against revision under section 263, holding that the PCIT exceeded jurisdictional authority. The Tribunal found that the deduction under section 80G for CSR expenditure claimed as donation was a debatable issue not warranting revisionary intervention. The PCIT failed to conduct proper inquiry or provide cogent reasons establishing that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. Instead, the PCIT improperly set aside the order with directions for revision. The ITAT emphasized that Explanation 2 to section 263 does not confer unlimited power to revise orders where the AO has already properly examined issues and taken a plausible view. The impugned order was declared void ab initio.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against revision under section 263, holding that the PCIT exceeded jurisdictional authority. The Tribunal found that the deduction under section 80G for CSR expenditure claimed as donation was a debatable issue not warranting revisionary intervention. The PCIT failed to conduct proper inquiry or provide cogent reasons establishing that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. Instead, the PCIT improperly set aside the order with directions for revision. The ITAT emphasized that Explanation 2 to section 263 does not confer unlimited power to revise orders where the AO has already properly examined issues and taken a plausible view. The impugned order was declared void ab initio.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
